Solution: be more open-minded... In hindsight, Grub2 is not all bad. Still not sure it was necessary, but.. whatever. I can now manage to do most everything I need/want to do with it.
Issue:
I have installed Fedora 16 on my recently acquired laptop. Overall I'm starting to appreciate the direction Fedora seems to be going. They apparently eliminated /etc/inittab, updated the boot process to use Gnome 3. One thing I can not comprehend is Grub 2. Grub was not exactly difficult to begin with. It was flat file with a bunch of similarly configured stanzas. Now it is a bunch of directories and config files and dependencies. At this point in time, Grub2 seems far less configurable than its predecessor. For example, I can not find a decent explanation of how to remove the Windows System partition from showing up in my boot menu. Nor can I locate how to update the legacy "splash.xpm.gz" to use a cool graphic background at boot time.
Issue:
I have installed Fedora 16 on my recently acquired laptop. Overall I'm starting to appreciate the direction Fedora seems to be going. They apparently eliminated /etc/inittab, updated the boot process to use Gnome 3. One thing I can not comprehend is Grub 2. Grub was not exactly difficult to begin with. It was flat file with a bunch of similarly configured stanzas. Now it is a bunch of directories and config files and dependencies. At this point in time, Grub2 seems far less configurable than its predecessor. For example, I can not find a decent explanation of how to remove the Windows System partition from showing up in my boot menu. Nor can I locate how to update the legacy "splash.xpm.gz" to use a cool graphic background at boot time.
I'd like to know what it was they thought they were fixing and how they came up with this solution. :-(
Comments
Post a Comment