Skip to main content

Using Kickstart (anaconda) on Dell with multiple internal disks

A number of our machines have multiple VDs created (i.e. 2 x 75GB for OS, 2 x 146GB for application).

After building an R910 with multiple VDs I discovered that /boot and <SWAP> were on the 75GB device, and the OS was on the 146GB device.  I wanted everything on the 75GB.

<excerpt from kickstart profile>

# STORAGE CONFIGURATION
zerombr yes
clearpart --all --initlabel
bootloader --location=mbr --driveorder=sda,sdb --append="nousbstorage"
part /boot --fstype ext4 --size=512 --asprimary --onbiosdisk=81
part pv.1 --size=1 --grow --onbiosdisk=81
volgroup VolGroup00 pv.1
logvol swap --fstype swap --name=LogVol00 --vgname=VolGroup00 --recommended
logvol / --fstype ext4 --fsoptions=noatime --name=LogVol01 --vgname=VolGroup00 --size=1024 --grow
#logvol / --fstype ext4 --fsoptions=noatime --name=LogVol01 --vgname=VolGroup00 --size=10240
</excerpt>

I had found numerous recommendations to deal with this situation.

  • nousbstorage - doesn't really seem to do anything, but there may be background stuff going on that I do not see/recognize
  • onbiosdisk - this option is pay-dirt.  However, most of the documentation I found did not explain what the option was doing or how to configure it.
- onbiosdisk -
http://en.community.dell.com/techcenter/os-applications/w/wiki/linux-installer-magic.aspx
As you can see from my own example, I did not get as complex as the Dell provided example.

I would like to include is how I was able to determine that Interrupt value (0x81).

Unfortunately you have to start a Kickstart that is ultimately doomed to fail to get the view (above).  Once the Kickstart has proceeded far enough that you are able to hit ALT-F2, do so.  Then run the find command shown in the image.  If you cd to that directory and do an ls -l it will provide a better identifier of which edd device is linked to.  (I may try to grab another screenshot showing that association.)
# find /dev/disk/by-id/
# fdisk -l | grep Disk


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

P2V using dd for KVM-QEMU guest

Preface: I have certainly not exhaustively tested this process.  I had a specific need and found a specific solution that worked. Situation:  I was issued a shiny new laptop running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 (with Corp VPN, certs, Authentication configuration, etc...)  The image was great, but I needed more flexibility on my bare metal.  So, my goal was to P2V the corporate image so I could just run it as a VM. * Remove corporate drive and install new SSD * install corp drive in external USB-3 case * Install RHEL 7 on new SSD * dd old drive to a disk-image file in a temp location which will be an image which is the same size as your actual drive (unless you have enough space in your destination to contain a temp and converted image) * convert the raw disk-image to a qcow file while pushing it to the final location - this step should reduce the disk size - however, I believe it will only reduce/collapse zero-byte blocks (not just free space - i.e. if you de...

Sun USS 7100 foo

TIP: put ALL of your LUNs into a designated TARGET and INITIATOR group when you create them.  If you leave them in the "default" group, then everything that does an discovery against the array will find them :-( I'm struggling to recognize a reason that a default should even be present on the array. Also - who, exactly, is Sun trying to kid.  The USS is simply a box.. running Solaris .. with IPMP and ZFS.  Great.  If you have ever attempted to "break-in" or "p0wn" your IBM HMC, you know that there are people out there that can harden a box - then.. there's Sun.  After a recent meltdown at the office I had to get quite intimate with my USS 7110 and learned quite a bit.  Namely: there's a shell ;-) My current irritation is how they attempt to "warn you" away from using the shell (my coverage expired a long time ago to worry about that) and then how they try to hide things, poorly. I was curious as to what version of SunOS it ...

Extending SNMP to run arbitrary shell script

Why are we here... This is not likely something I would have pursued under normal circumstances.  I happen to be working for a customer/client who is not afforded a lot of flexibility to accomplish their goals.  In this case, the rigor is justified.  They have to sometimes be fairly creative with how they solve problems. In this case they would like to utilize an existing snmp implementation to execute a command (or shell script) on a remote system.  They came to me with the idea of using Net-SNMP extend. https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Deployment_Guide/sect-System_Monitoring_Tools-Net-SNMP-Extending.html NOTE:  This is NOT a good implementation strategy in the "real world"  it will simply allow you to test the functionality.  There are a TON of security implications which would need to be taken in to consideration. Implementation Steps: [root@rh7tst01 ~]# yum -y install net-snmp net-snmp-utils ...