Skip to main content

Installed 16 GB memory on Lenovo T520

I have a Quad-Core i7 (details below) running Fedora 16.  16 gig is a bit overkill, but I have a need to run numerous VM's simultaneously and I don't feel like running out memory.  Besides, the memory was $80 a piece.

Now.. time will tell if this will be an unstable configuration ,but since the Corsair packaging clearly states "STABLE - RELIABLE - COMPATIBLE": I'm sure I have nothing to fear!

[root@neo ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo | tail -25
processor : 7
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 42
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2760QM CPU @ 2.40GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 800.000
cache size : 6144 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 8
core id : 3
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 7
initial apicid : 7
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes xsave avx lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips : 4783.98
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:



[root@neo ~]# cat /proc/meminfo 
MemTotal:       16316632 kB
MemFree:        14562200 kB
Buffers:           57160 kB
Cached:           815296 kB
SwapCached:            0 kB
Active:           874616 kB
Inactive:         540728 kB
Active(anon):     551612 kB
Inactive(anon):   150888 kB
Active(file):     323004 kB
Inactive(file):   389840 kB
Unevictable:          64 kB
Mlocked:              64 kB
SwapTotal:      10485756 kB
SwapFree:       10485756 kB
Dirty:               100 kB
Writeback:             0 kB
AnonPages:        542776 kB
Mapped:           131756 kB
Shmem:            159620 kB
Slab:              95876 kB
SReclaimable:      52680 kB
SUnreclaim:        43196 kB
KernelStack:        3352 kB
PageTables:        31824 kB
NFS_Unstable:          0 kB
Bounce:                0 kB
WritebackTmp:          0 kB
CommitLimit:    18644072 kB
Committed_AS:    2075472 kB
VmallocTotal:   34359738367 kB
VmallocUsed:      437172 kB
VmallocChunk:   34359285236 kB
HardwareCorrupted:     0 kB
AnonHugePages:    110592 kB
HugePages_Total:       0
HugePages_Free:        0
HugePages_Rsvd:        0
HugePages_Surp:        0
Hugepagesize:       2048 kB
DirectMap4k:       14336 kB
DirectMap2M:    16654336 kB

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

P2V using dd for KVM-QEMU guest

Preface: I have certainly not exhaustively tested this process.  I had a specific need and found a specific solution that worked. Situation:  I was issued a shiny new laptop running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 (with Corp VPN, certs, Authentication configuration, etc...)  The image was great, but I needed more flexibility on my bare metal.  So, my goal was to P2V the corporate image so I could just run it as a VM. * Remove corporate drive and install new SSD * install corp drive in external USB-3 case * Install RHEL 7 on new SSD * dd old drive to a disk-image file in a temp location which will be an image which is the same size as your actual drive (unless you have enough space in your destination to contain a temp and converted image) * convert the raw disk-image to a qcow file while pushing it to the final location - this step should reduce the disk size - however, I believe it will only reduce/collapse zero-byte blocks (not just free space - i.e. if you de...

Sun USS 7100 foo

TIP: put ALL of your LUNs into a designated TARGET and INITIATOR group when you create them.  If you leave them in the "default" group, then everything that does an discovery against the array will find them :-( I'm struggling to recognize a reason that a default should even be present on the array. Also - who, exactly, is Sun trying to kid.  The USS is simply a box.. running Solaris .. with IPMP and ZFS.  Great.  If you have ever attempted to "break-in" or "p0wn" your IBM HMC, you know that there are people out there that can harden a box - then.. there's Sun.  After a recent meltdown at the office I had to get quite intimate with my USS 7110 and learned quite a bit.  Namely: there's a shell ;-) My current irritation is how they attempt to "warn you" away from using the shell (my coverage expired a long time ago to worry about that) and then how they try to hide things, poorly. I was curious as to what version of SunOS it ...

Extending SNMP to run arbitrary shell script

Why are we here... This is not likely something I would have pursued under normal circumstances.  I happen to be working for a customer/client who is not afforded a lot of flexibility to accomplish their goals.  In this case, the rigor is justified.  They have to sometimes be fairly creative with how they solve problems. In this case they would like to utilize an existing snmp implementation to execute a command (or shell script) on a remote system.  They came to me with the idea of using Net-SNMP extend. https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Deployment_Guide/sect-System_Monitoring_Tools-Net-SNMP-Extending.html NOTE:  This is NOT a good implementation strategy in the "real world"  it will simply allow you to test the functionality.  There are a TON of security implications which would need to be taken in to consideration. Implementation Steps: [root@rh7tst01 ~]# yum -y install net-snmp net-snmp-utils ...